Wednesday, September 19, 2007

In Summary...

How does Rockland Place Apartments Limited Partnership and Connolly & Partners LLC accommodate residents with disabilities? They don't.

Ask for a reasonable accommodation for a specific disability and they will use their knowledge of that particular disability to harass you from your subsidized unit; therefore, deliberately denying you access to a state and/or federal program.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Fairytales, Falsehoods, and Fibs from the Crib

During several meetings, 'new owners' promised to keep tenants 'informed every step of the way' during renovations. They even promised to provide residents with the option of storage, trucks, and/or renovated units during this difficult time.

Residents asked 'new' landlords what plans they had to rid the complex of drug dealers. Mr. Joe Caffey insisted 'drug dealers would see they had a new sheriff in Town and just leave'. Tenants were told security cameras would be installed in common areas and a police substation would exist on the property.

Included in these fairytales was the promise of a new handicapped-accessible shuttle to and from the Abington Commuter Rail and Super Stop & Shop at least a couple of times per week. However, since the official takeover of 11-1-2006, residents of Spring Gate have only recently been invited to share use of a free school bus with senior citizens in another complex. It only travels on Thursdays from 9am and returns by 10:20am. This old school bus is not even handicapped-accessible.

Time and time again, residents were promised that our apartments would be 'affordable into perpetuity' by Mr. Joe Armstrong and staff of the 'new' Rockland Place Apartment complex, dba Spring Gate. Meanwhile, MassHousing continued approving rent increases while Management is, and has been, in non-compliance of subsidy programs. Recently, I received a notice ordering me to pay more than 30% of my income while on the HUD section 236 program. Corporate landlord claimed I should pay them an amount above and beyond what I receive each month. 'Affordable into perpetuity?' ..... I think not.

With a MassHousing representative present, I again requested landlord comply with Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 186 in regard to obtaining property insurance information. I reminded executives that I've provided numerous written requests over several years, and have not yet received this information. Mr. Armstrong promised he would get this to us very shortly. Four months later, residents are still waiting.

Saturday, September 8, 2007

Insufficient Notice of Entry

This is how Management disregards my written request for reasonable accommodation even after being contacted by Fair Housing Center of Greater Boston: (click on images to enlarge)

Thursday afternoon August 30, 2007, I received a notice from this property mgr. that workmen will need full access to my apartment 'Starting Tuesday 9-4-07 from 8am-4pm'. No one showed. No one called.

On Wednesday 9-5-07, I was startled from a sleep by an unfamiliar workman inside my living room after he ripped open the locked patio door. Is this what 'having the right to feel secure' inside your home means? I called Management to ask her about this situation. She claimed she gave me sufficient notice. Really? And how long does 'STARTING TUESDAY' last for?

On Thursday and Friday, instead of finishing up the work they started, workmen worked on other uncompleted buildings. Residents have been seriously inconvenienced and unexpectedly disturbed with noise, interference, and inaccurate notice of work schedules.

Without notice, Saturday 9-8-07, I was awakened by loud hammering and drilling outside my third floor bedroom window. I looked out to see a workman raising a hammer toward my window and walls. Again, no notice. It sure would be nice if leases and laws for tenants were enforced on these HUD/Mass Housing properties.


Even with all the overtime, the windows and patio doors still aren't complete. Neither are the common areas. It is a hazardous and stressful place to have to live. Let's reward these corporate landlords with another rent increase for being in constant violation of occupancy agreements.

Management's convenient misdates and miscalculations reminds me of a suspicious building fire in July 2001, when damaged apartment doors were shown to an insurance adjuster. By now, all hatchet-damaged doors should have been replaced. Perhaps door installers weren't able to gain access to vacated units?

And, where are all the handicapped people for all those newly-renovated handicapped units?

And, where is the answer to my request for reasonable accommodation? Is it in Management's 'STARTING Tuesday' notice? Perhaps their response to my request is in the Summary Process for Eviction?

Spring Gate's renovated dumpster area.

Monday, September 3, 2007

Malice Palace

Calculating Corporate, Subsidized Landlord Misdates and Miscalculates

Rockland Place Apts. LP dba Spring Gate landlords-agents, demand I not correct their fraudulent documents before signing them. This way, owners may get more undeserved, low-income housing tax credits (LIHTC) from the IRS. While 'new' owners receive millions in government grants, tenants at this subsidized housing complex are unjustly threatened with eviction and loss of subsidies. Overcharges have occurred.

Mid-March 2007, I was told to sign a misdated and false document regarding how much I paid for rent 2-months out of the year. When I corrected dates to coincide with rent figures, management refused to accept the signed documents and told me they would remove my subsidy if I didn't sign them 'as is'. When I asked for further explanation, I was told to leave their office.

These unusual circumstances forced me to fax the corrected and signed recertification papers to HUD and MassHousing. I never received documentation from HUD or MassHousing removing the subsidy; so continued paying the appropriate rent. Eviction proceedings were filed in August 2007, by substandard, subsidized property attorney, Stephen M. Scolnick, with false accusations of rent owed.

It appears these abusive corporate partners attempt to extort money by falsifying documents. They certainly don't hesitate to misuse their powerful connections and positions to harass and intimidate vulnerable tenants. Owners/Mgmt. have not answered some written requests for Reasonable Accommodation, which is also in violation of the Fair Housing Act. I was supposed to get to housing court 9-4-07 to file an answer to their false charges; however, we were notified workers would need access to our units from 8am-4pm throughout the day. So I never made court and workers never showed up. Mgmt. didn't even call to let us know about it. It's not the first time something like this has happened. These convenient 'mishaps' and 'miscalculations' work to benefit this corporate landlord/partnership.

MHFA or MassHousing keeps awarding these corporations and partnerships more rent increases while they violate tenants' rights, and are in non-compliance with laws and regulations of the state and federal subsidy programs. HUD refuses to get involved and continues passing letters and calls to MassHousing. Under the Freedom of Information Act, see HUD REAC scores for this property, and Hotline Case # HL-06-0620. With substandard housing conditions forced upon tenants in poverty, these rich partnerships certainly don't deserve Low-Income Housing Tax Credits by the IRS.

One of the 'new' corporate partners of Rockland Place Apts. owns the management company, and the construction company hired to do some of the shoddy construction work and low-quality paint jobs. Roofing work caused ceiling leakage and need for re-repair -- And the holey hot hallways are simply gorgeous too! Just don't accidentally hang yourself from all the exposed wires.

After paying larger rent increases, purchasing more aspirin, and stuffing our ears with plugs, low-income tenants have been required to leave their rented units for 2-3 days to experience unreimbursed personal property damage by negligent workers during 'renovations'. True justice is rarely available for U.S. citizens unable to afford it.

Some of the landlords' affiliated companies have previously been charged with fraud, diverting funds, etc. amounting to millions of dollars in financial crimes against our government... So why does HUD continue to do business with unethical people and corporations? And, why all the corporate name games? For more information, read the article 'Diversions Unlimited' - http://boston.indymedia.org/feature/display/62621/index.php - Mr. Joe Armstrong, who is associated with the landlord, responded to the well-researched article with contempt for the author/tenant, and violated her personal information. Mr. Armstrong even suggested a tenant, who is legally disabled with a limited income, was in subsidized housing too long.

This information was obtained through research and personal experience.